Which language gives you more?

Pick up to 4 languages and see them measured against each other: how many words reach half of everyday speech, how much of the language the top 100 carries, and how steeply each frequency curve falls away.

Chinese–English subtitles (English side) Add a language

Side by side

The best value in each row is marked. Read across, not down.

Comparison of the selected languages across key frequency measures
Measure Chinese–English subtitles (English side)
Corpus size Tokens of subtitle dialogue counted. More data means a steadier ranking46.6M
Distinct word forms Unique surface forms found. A measure of morphology, not of quality231.1K
Words for half of speech Fewer is better. Less vocabulary buys more of the language116
Words for 80% Entries needed to cover 80% of running text3,580
Top 100 covers Share of all speech carried by the 100 most common entries48.1%
Top 10 covers Share carried by the ten most common entries alone18.4%
Whole list covers Share of running text the full ranked list accounts for83.9%
Promoted phrases Multi-word units ranked alongside single words1,288
Average word length Characters per word across the top 1,000. Descriptive, not a virtue4.7

Where each language's weight sits

Share of running text carried by each band. A front-loaded language rewards a small vocabulary more.

Share of running text covered by each frequency band
BandChinese–English subtitles (English side)
Top 100 48.1%
101–500 17.9%
501–1,000 5.7%
1,001–2,000 4.8%
2,001–4,000 4.1%
4,001–8,000 3.3%

The five most common words in each

Ranked within their own corpus, translated to English.

Chinese–English subtitles (English side)

  1. 1 you you
  2. 2 the the
  3. 3 i I
  4. 4 to to
  5. 5 a a

Choose languages to compare

Pick up to 4.1/4 selected

The first 23 are built from the same 2,166 films, so their rankings can be compared directly.

KataRank. Prebuilt frequency dictionaries. No account, no scraping, no translation calls.

© 2026 KataRank.com Made with love in Stockholm